psneeld
Guru
CarlF...I forget now....did you work as an assistance tower or with a salvage company? Maybe in the insurance end... I think I remember a connection from previous posts but now I am not sure.
Running the AC on an unattended boat for days on end is an invitation to this sort of problem. The boat getting hot is not an issue. Mold is something all boaters must deal with. As far as the frig not being able to keep-up, well that's a separate problem. But then if the AC crapped and took down the battery, would the frig stop operating also?
Welcome to Admiralty Law!
Salvors can board any unocuppied vessel without permission and pretty much do anything they want to save the boat. Salvage is federal law - it is not subject to state consumer protection or contract law. They have their own court, lawyers, and judges. The Supreme Court has repeatedly supported large salvage awards.
This is not correct. There is a difference between unoccupied and abandoned. I seriously doubt that USTB could make a successful case that the boat was in peril. At best they can make a case that they were contracted by the marina. With out seeing the moorage agreement it is unknown if the marina has the rights to make such a contract on behalf of the tenant.
This is not correct. There is a difference between unoccupied and abandoned. I seriously doubt that USTB could make a successful case that the boat was in peril. At best they can make a case that they were contracted by the marina. With out seeing the moorage agreement it is unknown if the marina has the rights to make such a contract on behalf of the tenant.
Of course, legal cases are hard to predict.
My contract with the marina states the marina is not responsible for transient dockage. I have however used them regularly for the past 5 years and have a relationship with the dock master and he said he would keep an eye on things for me.
The dock master was horrified when he heard the cost and was so apologetic as he said he had no idea what the cost would be. He agreed there was no danger of the boat sinking or anything like that and shut down the ac that caused the high water alarm so there was no chance of the problem getting worse.
He said he should have left it for me to deal with as he knew my return dates. He just wanted to make sure the ac was the problem and that's why he decided to remove the water.
The dock master and the live aboard neighbor said there was zero evidence of any spillage or sheen in the water as I asked them and there was no coast guard report. There was also zero chance of the boat sinking. The way my bilges work is that if the one gets to high. the water will seep into the other engine bilge and that was dry and clean so no chance of sinking. When I asked the owner of the TBUS, he agreed the boat was not sinking or in any danger of sinking.
A lawyer has advised me to turn this over to my insurance company and request for me to suggest that they request an adjuster/survey to review the situation and demand the documentation from TBUS and basically have them and their attorneys put a stop to these shenanigans. That's what I have done and waiting for the insurance company to advise.
A sage old Coast Guard officer told me the
"Rule of Threes"
When threw things go wrong as a cascading chain of event, your situation can and usually does get bad, often in a hurry.
I would count your leaky engines which you admit put oil in the bulge, drip pans or not.
Your failed electrical system leading to failed pump
Your leaky Air on unit
That's three.
If I were in your shoes I'd feel very lucky to have had someone care enough to come aboard a strange boat and figure out all these issues
He may not have known he wasn't saving your boat from sinking, he was just being responsible on your behalf, trying to do the right thing. He may well have been thinking, "what else might go wrong here?"
I'm pretty sure I wouldn't have hung up on the TBUS guys that might still be asked to save you bacon , IN YOUR ABSENCE.
As much as it hurts, I think you need to pay up and at least mend the Fence with your Marina buddy, not to mention avoiding the insurance company which in the end is going to cost probably more than the 5k, legitimate or not.
Yes, contaminated fuel is both hazardous, and a waste if you want to dispose of it, so hazardous waste. The more common technique is to have a company come with pumps and filers and polish your fuel, circulating it back to tank. More work, but no haz waste generated except the used filters.So, did the remediation team show up in HazMat suits and such?
When I was in San Francisco planning to come to Mexico, I thought about having my 15-year old diesel fuel removed as it no longer bore any resemblance to diesel fuel (it reminded me of Linseed Oil). I called around a was shocked to find it was considered hazardous waste and would cost over $4000 to remove 100 gals. My ancient Perkins seemed unphased by the crud so I triple-dosed with Stanadyne and went with the old fuel. Worked fine.
I really feel for your situation. But I have a question for you. Once called, what would you have expected the Sea Tow folks to do? If they ignored the situation and it later proved to be a large waste oil situation, they would have liability.
Tough situation. But sounds like you were the only one with knowledge that the situation was far from dangerous. Everyone else (marina, TBUS) erred on the side of caution.
You may want to ask TBUS what the actual disposal fees were. The stuff had to go somewhere. I would think hazardous material disposal is well tracked down to the ounce.
Best of luck. What a PITA
Peter
Fuel wasn't contaminated so I doubt polishing would have solved snything. It was 12+ years old and had evolved into something not immediately recognizable as diesel. It was dark and smelled like Linseed Oil. I did my best to dilute it with fresh diesel and added a LOT of Stanadyne. My Perkins seemed to be fine with it. Ran happily for 500 nms straight. Go figure.Yes, contaminated fuel is both hazardous, and a waste if you want to dispose of it, so hazardous waste. The more common technique is to have a company come with pumps and filers and polish your fuel, circulating it back to tank. More work, but no haz waste generated except the used filters.
I am not going to comment about a specific case I know nothing about. Also, people slamming others on the internet for perceived transgressions is not my cup of tea. With that said, I have had nothing but good interactions with both Boat US and Sea Tow in my area. I have personally witnessed, and heard them on the VHF save many peoples bacon over the years.
Keep in mind that the particular Towboat/US is probably a franchise so don’t label all of them as bad. In every place in life you will find a bad apple, maybe this is one???
Just a comment. Had a small dink 13ft with 30hp O/B sunk in a storm. I was in Hawaii, boat in Calif. Called Sea Tow and they would not take it on, said they don't do salvage at all. That was the Main office, not the franchise as Sea Tow doesn't have a franchise in Norcal, they just farm out to Boat US. This was before they even knew where the boat was. All contacts I have had with Sea Tow and Boat US have been professionally handled with reasonable fees for services rendered.
What is ridiculous is everyone contesting what is a legal salvage. Where the owners rights end and the salvors right begin and and misguided concept of who can authorize action. Those arguing against legitimate salvages don't understand Salcon-89
MaDehn
There are two fatal flaws in your advice. First is the harbor master perceived an issue and absent the owner’s availability proceeds with a by the book response.
Secondly when dealing with monetary issues involving murky actions and responsibilities a simple negotiated settlement between the parties should be the starting point.
Subpoenas, legal action and bravado may get the job done but at what cost. And, there is always the rest of the story —-