Boatless?

The friendliest place on the web for anyone who enjoys boating.
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.

Doc

Guru
Joined
Oct 5, 2007
Messages
508
Today I went with a friend to tow the yc sailing dinghies out into the harbor for a social sail.

One of our major topics of conversation was the price of fuel.

I told him that never before in my life was I so happy to be totally boatless. I want another one but I am feeling that now is not the time.

So...sh*t


-- Edited by Doc on Wednesday 22nd of February 2012 06:49:23 PM
 
there is no time like the present to own a boat. :)
 
Doc wrote:I want another one but I am feeling that now is not the time.
Fuel is never going to get cheaper.* If the increasing cost of fuel is a major factor in one's decision to get into boating (or back into boating), then I would say the decision has already been made for them and that a boat is not in their future.

As fuel prices continue to rise overall it has so far not made a difference in how we use our boat.* But it might someday.* However our plan for that is not to use the boat less often or to get rid of it but to take shorter trips.*

Fortunately we are in a location where shorter trips still get you to great places.* We have our own "private" bay in the islands that we go to on a regular basis that is only a three hour run away.* We get as much enjoyment from being down there as we do being up in Desolation Sound or the Gulf Islands or other destinations that are a day or more away.


-- Edited by Marin on Thursday 23rd of February 2012 02:09:02 PM
 
Doc, if you want to get the feeling of owning a boat again, here's an idea. *Just send me your credit card to fill up my boat. *I will guarantee you to get the feeling of being a yacht owner by 30 days time.
biggrin.gif
 
Thank you Marin for saying for saying " If the increasing cost of fuel is a major factor in one's decision to get into boating (or back into boating), then I would say the decision has already been made for them and that a boat is not in their future."

It gives me a great opening for this quote from Howard Nemorov: "Obvious enough that generalities work to protect the mind from the great outdoors..." :)

I do plan to get another boat. Boats are for going someplace. If I want to look at the water, all I have to do is look out the window of my house. I guess that I could pull the car around to the backyard and sleep in it...comparable to going two miles and anchoring...except I can go back in the house if I want.

The reason that the tug went is because it was slow. I want to go faster now.I don't plan any more multi thousand mile trips. A round trip of a hundred miles is more fitting to my life style now. But, unfortunately fast equals cash so I am taking my time to find the right combination. I like your boat, Moonstruck.
 
Doc wrote:
Today I went with a friend to tow the yc sailing dinghies out into the harbor for a social sail.

One of our major topics of conversation was the price of fuel.

I told him that never before in my life was I so happy to be totally boatless. I want another one but I am feeling that now is not the time.

So...sh*t



-- Edited by Doc on Wednesday 22nd of February 2012 06:49:23 PM
*I am with you on that one.*
aww.gif


When we move off and sell the Eagle I will buy/own a boat under 20 ft and trailer able.* I will never have another boat that is moored in water again.* Its just TOO!***
disbelief.gif
**

The only way I can justify the Eagle is we LIVE ON IT!*
aww.gif


after we sell the Eagle we plan on owning nothing, rent/lease, and*totally liquid and mobile.* I do not want the responsibilty and expense of ownership.*
hmm.gif


*


-- Edited by Phil Fill on Thursday 23rd of February 2012 04:07:52 PM
 
Phil Fill wrote:Doc wrote:
Today I went with a friend to tow the yc sailing dinghies out into the harbor for a social sail.

One of our major topics of conversation was the price of fuel.

I told him that never before in my life was I so happy to be totally boatless. I want another one but I am feeling that now is not the time.

So...sh*t



-- Edited by Doc on Wednesday 22nd of February 2012 06:49:23 PM
*I am with you on that one.*
aww.gif


When we move off and sell the Eagle I will buy/own a boat under 20 ft and trailer able.* I will never have another boat that is moored in water again.* Its just TOO!***
disbelief.gif
**

The only way I can justify the Eagle is we LIVE ON IT!*
aww.gif


after we sell the Eagle we plan on owning nothing, rent/lease, and*totally liquid and mobile.* I do not want the responsibilty and expense of ownership.*
hmm.gif


Jees Phil Fill that just makes me want to shoot myself. *Don't be so down on the responsibilty and expense of ownership...I just wrenched on the port genset for about 10 hours. *I don't think I accomplished anything....Still feeling it though
smile.gif


*



-- Edited by Phil Fill on Thursday 23rd of February 2012 04:07:52 PM

*
 
Phil Fill wrote:
The only way I can justify the Eagle is we LIVE ON IT!*
aww.gif


*

*I've never heard of the owning of a boat being justified unless it is a commercial boat. *Commercial boats are not yachts. *So that leaves yachts out.

When Lou asked me my biggest fault, I said that's easy. *I spend too much daum much money boating, and that's not going to change. *She said that's OK with her. *Let's enjoy it. *So, we do that as much as we can.
 
Moonstruck wrote:Phil Fill wrote:
The only way I can justify the Eagle is we LIVE ON IT!*
aww.gif


*

*I've never heard of the owning of a boat being justified unless it is a commercial boat. *Commercial boats are not yachts. *So that leaves yachts out.

When Lou asked me my biggest fault, I said that's easy. *I spend too much daum much money boating, and that's not going to change. *She said that's OK with her. *Let's enjoy it. *So, we do that as much as we can.

*You are wise beyond your years Don.
 
Doc wrote:
I told him that never before in my life was I so happy to be totally boatless. I want another one but I am feeling that now is not the time.

So...sh*t



-- Edited by Doc on Wednesday 22nd of February 2012 06:49:23 PM
*So what you're saying Doc is that you just had the second happiest day of your life?
 
Carey wrote:
*You are wise beyond your years Don.

*Thanks Carey, but at my age it's difficult to be wise beyond one's years. *Just glad to be here.
happy.gif
 
"Fuel is never going to get cheaper. "

Nonsense, like all comoddities it is subject to the Laws of supply and demand.

Should the US Gov stop placing 85% of our own energy "off limits"the price will plummet again.

No .20c diesel is not in the cards soon , but $2.00 is possible.

Coal conversion to oil at under $35.00 a bbl , is no problem, except for "permission" from our rulers.
 
FF wrote:
"Fuel is never going to get cheaper. "

Nonsense, like all comoddities it is subject to the Laws of supply and demand.
Really!* Usage is down for gasoling over the last three years in this country.* So what does big oil do?* Sell it to other countries that will use it and then guess what? The supply here is down again, oh darn we*have to raise the price.
 
Higher Fuel prices means less boats on the water. This is a bad thing?
 
FF wrote:

Nonsense, like all comoddities it is subject to the Laws of supply and demand.
This is true but the laws of supply and demand include the whole planet today,* not just the US.* The current rise of fuel prices in the US is not due to under-production (although one of the refineries in Washington State just blew up last week).* It's not due to a shortage of crude.* It's not due to terrorism threats.* It's not even due to political power plays.

It's due to the oil companies reducing their sale of fuel in the US so they can sell more of it to China, India, and the other emerging economies whose demand for fuel is skyrocketing.

So our fuel supply is "short" but not short because it really is, but because more fuel is going elsewhere which means the oil companies earn more on two fronts--- higher prices in the US and higher sales volume in the developing countries where the fuel that would have been sold in the US is going.
 
Marin wrote:
It's due to the oil companies reducing their sale of fuel in the US so they can sell more of it to China, India, and the other emerging economies whose demand for fuel is skyrocketing.

So our fuel supply is "short" but not short because it really is, but because more fuel is going elsewhere which means the oil companies earn more on two fronts--- higher prices in the US and higher sales volume in the developing countries where the fuel that would have been sold in the US is going.
* * * ** Absolutely true...so says Lou Dobbs.*

******* We can drill until the cows come home and it won't affect the price at the pumps one bit. It would appear that all the crap that's been heaped on the oil companies just might have been justified.
 
SeaHorse II wrote:Marin wrote:
It's due to the oil companies reducing their sale of fuel in the US so they can sell more of it to China, India, and the other emerging economies whose demand for fuel is skyrocketing.

So our fuel supply is "short" but not short because it really is, but because more fuel is going elsewhere which means the oil companies earn more on two fronts--- higher prices in the US and higher sales volume in the developing countries where the fuel that would have been sold in the US is going.
* * * ** Absolutely true...so says Lou Dobbs.*

******* We can drill until the cows come home and it won't affect the price at the pumps one bit. It would appear that all the crap that's been heaped on the oil companies just might have been justified.

*Whaat? That, that is a liberal point of view. can the leopard change his spots?
biggrin.gif
 
dwhatty wrote:Whaat? That, that is a liberal point of view. can the leopard change his spots?
biggrin.gif
* * * ** Thanks, David! I had a bet with Renee that you would come through with a similar remark & you did! I'm now a hundred dollars richer! The statement, however is true. The GD oil companies appear to be the villains as far as the price of gas & diesel is concerned.




*
 

Attachments

  • snow leopard.jpg
    snow leopard.jpg
    18 KB · Views: 65
Do you suppose the owner of this is still boatless.* (Derelict on shallow waters in middle of Suisun Bay, on the charts and still there this day.)
 

Attachments

  • suisun wreck2.jpg
    suisun wreck2.jpg
    109.9 KB · Views: 77
nobama has actively fought oil production to force the price higher, to make alternative energy sources more feasible. It's an agenda.
 
Keith wrote:
nobama has actively fought oil production to force the price higher, to make alternative energy sources more feasible. It's an agenda.
*Correct!
 
Keith wrote:nobama has actively fought oil production to force the price higher, to make alternative energy sources more feasible. It's an agenda.* Wrong
Marin Wrote:

*So our fuel supply is "short" but not short because it really is, but because more fuel is going elsewhere which means the oil companies earn more on two fronts--- higher prices in the US and higher sales volume in the developing countries where the fuel that would have been sold in the US is going. Right
This has been documented!! By encouraging other countries like Brazil, to drill, refine and export oil, our Big Oil will have to lower their price if they expect to sell anything to China. It is a fact, we are using less oil that we did some years ago and the excess is being sold to China, keeping our supply low and with it, higher prices.
 
You are absolutely correct. I have been involved in oil and gas since the 1990 and for the 4 weeks ending Feb 10, 2012 the refiners in the US have exported 2.928 million barrels of distilled product per day. 85% of it is gasoline. US refiners are not allowed to export oil produced in the US but can export refined products, nice loophole. This price increase is driven by speculators, political unrest and international demand by China, India plus developing countries. This is capitalism at its best and exactly how it is supposed to work. Highest bidder gets the supply and other countries are willing and able to pay more than US customers. Refinery capacity in the mid west and gulf coast is more than adaquate to supply US market even with some of them down for maintence in other parts of the US. There is more oil being discovered and the concept of pike oil is now being reevaluated.
 
The Obama administration has taken the huge oil reserves of the US off the table. *As far as the world market is concerned, it is as if they do not exist. *This has a huge affect on the psychology of the market. *It makes supplies appear tighter than the known reserves would indicate. *That causes an increase in the value of the known active supplies. *This in effect supports the agenda to drive us to green energy sources.
 
SeaHorse II wrote:The GD oil companies appear to be the villains as far as the price of gas & diesel is concerned.
*I don't think it's just the oil companies.* The price and distribution of oil is as much determined by the oil speculators--- here and abroad--- as it is by the oil companies themselves.* Even more so maybe.

I don't blame the oil companies for the price of fuel so much as I do the speculators and commodities "brokers."* The oil companies pump it out, turn it into something, and sell that something to whoever pays the most for it minus whatever political pressure can be brought to bear on them not to.

The amount a country or distribution company pays for oil or refined petroleum products is largely based on what the commodities speculators on the planet--- the middle men as it were--- have done to the price.

If they make it more profitable--- for themselves AND the oil companies--- to sell product in country X than in country Y, the product will go to country X.

Then when you add on the taxes countries, states/provinces, counties, cities even, attach to the sale of fuel to the public to raise revenue, the water starts getting really muddy.* The oil companies don't have anything to do with or reap any benefit or penalty from the taxes attached to the price of a gallon/litre of fuel.* The taxes are courtesy of our elected officials.

I read somewhere awhile back that the actual price of a gallon or litre of gasoline in the US was pretty much the same as the price of a gallon or litre of gasoline in Europe.* The big difference was not what the oil companies were selling their product for, but the taxes that were applied to the product along the line from the tanker that brought it to the tank in your car.

I don't know if this is still true as energy becomes a more volatile commodity on the planet, or if it was ever true.* But the explanation I read at the time made sense.* And he will find getting back into boating much more pleasant.* And we'll all owe him big time.

So, you can blame the oil companies if you want to.* It's sort of like blaming Ford for the increasing cost of automobiles.* And I don't mean to imply that the oil companies are the poor innocents who are just "doing their job."

But I think the consumer's wrath is far more deserved by the speculators and commodities brokers who do NOTHING to produce, refine, or distribute fuel but simply make oodles of money--- oodles that are paid for by us in the cost of the product--- by "passing" the product through their grubby little hands.

This same mentality can be found in the guys who at one end pay a lobsterman $2.00 a pound for a lobster which at the oher end costs you $20 a pound.

While a US president might have some effect on all this in the form of some sort of "energy" policy (which the global market will for the most part totally ignore), I think the effect of whatever the president believes about energy has pretty much squat-all to do with what you pay for a gallon of gas this afternoon.* In that respect I no more blame Obama for my fuel bill than I did Bush or Clinton or Bush or Reagan or.........

It seems a little hypocritical and naive to on the one hand preach about how socialism/communism is bad and that captitalism and free markets and the individual right to succeed is where it's at, and then whine about what capitalism, free markets, and the individual right to succeed has done to your fuel bill. :)

PS-- Regarding the pipeline that Obama supposedly "nixed," it's my understanding that the pipeline and its proposed route has to be approved by every state it would cross.* Nebraska didn't like the route and said so.* They want the route changed in certain places.* It is my understanding based on what I've heard on the radio and read that Obama put a hold on the project at Nebraska's--- or at least the people in Nebraska with the power's-- request to hold it up it until Nebraska's concerns could be addressed.

And what does all this have to do with Doc's original question?* Well, if Doc can wipe out the oil speculators on the planet he will probably find that the cost of filling the tank on a boat will come down, or stay the same, or at least not go up so fast. So he wil find returning to boating that much more pleasant and we will all owe him big time.





-- Edited by Marin on Sunday 26th of February 2012 05:48:42 PM
 
Marin wrote:It seems a little hypocritical and naive to on the one hand preach about how socialism/communism is bad and that captitalism and free markets and the individual right to succeed is where it's at, and then whine about what capitalism, free markets, and the individual right to succeed has done to your fuel bill.
*Right on.
 
Marin wrote: I don't think it's just the oil companies.* The price and distribution of oil is as much determined by the oil speculators--- here and abroad--- as it is by the oil companies themselves.* Even more so maybe.
______________________________________________________
* * * ** What I am talking* about here is the supply of oil that is available to the US consumer in the form of gasoline. What taxes are imposed or what the speculators price crude at does not impact the* price as much as the available supply does. We have plenty of oil in the US to satisfy our needs but when a* big portion of that supply is rerouted to China, (thus keeping the US consumer's supply low) the price on what's available* to US consumers goes up.

It seems that about every publication, TV news show & radio talk show is complaining about the lack of crude here in the US. They are quick to blame the President, Congress and anyone or any body else they can think of. Why do you think our government is pretty much ignoring the "Drill Baby Drill" crowd? It's because they know what the real problem is and by blaming it on the speculators, payback is achieved for the people that put them in office!

Fact: Big oil is shipping a huge amount of "our oil" over seas, thus keeping the price high because of the available supply to US refineries. I am not at liberty to say how I know this, but trust me! I know this! :frustrated:
 
SeaHorse II wrote:
* * * ** What I am talking* about here is the supply of oil that is available to the US consumer in the form of gasoline. What taxes are imposed or what the speculators price crude at does not impact the* price as much as the available supply does. We have plenty of oil in the US to satisfy our needs but when a* big portion of that supply is rerouted to China, (thus keeping the US consumer's supply low) the price on what's available* to US consumers goes up.
I agree with that.* All I'm saying is that part of the reason oil is re-routed to the best markets is what the speculators do to enhance those markets.* This in turn reduces the supply avaiable for the US market, which is not as lucrative as the overseas market.*

But then in an, "Oh, by the way" move, the oil companies and the speculators say, "since there's not so much fuel available here right now, you're gonna have to compete (aka pay more for) what there is."

Under normal circumstances (meaning way in the past) reduced fuel demand in the US meant a rollback of product price.* Then everyone in the business realized this was dumb, so they adapted the strategy of reducing production for various "reasons" when the demand dropped so that the supply would drop right along with the demand and the price would stabilize at "no change."* Or if they got really creative, they could reduce production even more than the reduction in demand and then the price could go up even though the demand was falling.

Now we have this big global market so the industry has a new win-win strategy.* Doesn't matter what the demand does in the US anymore because all these other countries can't get enough of it at any price.* So they can supply fuel a high prices to this rapidly growing market outside the US while at the same time reducing the supply of fuel in the US.* So even if the demand in the US fell to one gallon a day, the industry would simply send all their product to these markets clamoring for fuel and leave a half-gallon of gas here.* So the price of fuel here would still be sky high.

There's only one way to beat this so far as I can see, and that's to become part of the fuel industry.* Either directly or as a stockholder, which is what I did a long time ago when it became pretty apparent what was happening.

Hoping the gummint or some other white knight is going to show up to fix this is living in a dream world.

By the way, Newt pretty much drove the last nail into the coffin of his political career here in Washington (State) last weak when during a rally he promised that if elected president he would get us $2.50 a gallon gas.* Even dyed-in -the-wool conservatives doubled over in stitches at that one according to the paper.

Between his moon colony and $2.50 a gallon fuel, I think Newt has pretty much blown his crediblity with anyone having an IQ greater than their shoe size.





-- Edited by Marin on Sunday 26th of February 2012 07:19:17 PM
 
Old Stone wrote:
About time for "Off the Deep End" ?
You're right on with that one.* If the moderators don't move it I suggest we do if anyone wants to continue the conversation.
 
Why are my posts always hijacked? I guess everyone picks on a boatless person.
 
Back
Top Bottom