f508
Senior Member
I forum searched boat buying process because I thought this topic has probably already been covered, but I didn't see anything.
It appears that the convention is:
1. View the boat.
2. Make an offer.
3. Pay to have boat hauled, surveyed, and sea trialed
4. Attempt to renegotiate based on the finding of the above, or walk away losing the price of the haul, survey and sea trial.
It seems like I will be about $1000 into the deal before I know what I am actually offering to buy.
Presumably the owner knows the status of the boat, would it be unreasonable to ask him to disclose any known defects, if I stipulated that the disclosed defects would not become a basis for the second round of negotiation? Or would that be futile or wildly unusual to suggest?
When you guys made your offers, did you assume the boat was gong to survey fine, so you didn't mind making that kind of commitment?
If this has already been covered, could someone kindly point me to that thread?
Thanks,
Frank
It appears that the convention is:
1. View the boat.
2. Make an offer.
3. Pay to have boat hauled, surveyed, and sea trialed
4. Attempt to renegotiate based on the finding of the above, or walk away losing the price of the haul, survey and sea trial.
It seems like I will be about $1000 into the deal before I know what I am actually offering to buy.
Presumably the owner knows the status of the boat, would it be unreasonable to ask him to disclose any known defects, if I stipulated that the disclosed defects would not become a basis for the second round of negotiation? Or would that be futile or wildly unusual to suggest?
When you guys made your offers, did you assume the boat was gong to survey fine, so you didn't mind making that kind of commitment?
If this has already been covered, could someone kindly point me to that thread?
Thanks,
Frank