I am rebuilding the running gear on a boat of mine. When I pulled the skeg off I found it was attached with 6 stainless cap screws that had been tapped and screwed into the glass. Not sure I really like the way it was done but it lasted 40 years in a gillnet boat.
Sounds easy enough. Though I have some questions. What diameter? What length?. When I looked at the boat in the fall, I thought of that too but in addition to the above questions, my biggest question is "what is down there?" Is it solid fiberglass? Fiberglass over a wood keel? How thick would it be? I read somewhere on these forums that some keels have concrete down there?6 stainless cap screws that had been tapped and screwed into the glass.
Ahhhh...what would he turn off and on again, alormaria..?
Yes, looks pretty much identical to that of my Clipper (CHB) 34 in post #39. https://www.trawlerforum.com/forums...-36-europa-sedan-project-boat-61650-2.html#39Max - here is a photo of my rudder lower support keel extension in case it is of any help (CHB34). I have never opened my keel, but I think it is fibreglass shell filled with a cement/ballast mix (aka concrete).
Regards,
Nick
Max I am confused.We'll have to get caught up on the status of the Skeg next year.
My plan is to fix it in the spring of the 2023 season. For 2022 the repair I made to the rudder shaft should last me a season or two.
We'll have to get caught up on the status of the Skeg next year.
My plan is to fix it in the spring of the 2023 season. For 2022 the repair I made to the rudder shaft should last me a season or two.
In the meantime I am "all ears" to more suggestions for skeg repair.
I am heavily favouring a metal bar bolted to the bottom shown in the last photo (of another boat in the yard) of this post here:
https://www.trawlerforum.com/forums/showpost.php?p=1067238&postcount=34
Meanwhile... Back to work!!!
Here is the pulpit. As purchased, it was smashed and pieces were missing.
Fortunately I was able to find them laying about in the bow.
Having crashed a lot of model airplanes in my day, one thing I have found is: If you pick up all the pieces, you ~might~ be able to put it all together again.... "Maybe"...
One thing I found when taking the Pulpit apart so that I can work on it was the fact that the pin that locks the anchor in place was seized solid with paint and other gunk on the pin. I had to pound that sucker out. Which made me realise that whomever had this boat before probably hadn't dropped the anchor in a while. Which begs the question: What would they have done in an emergency?
Oh well, I got the pin out, removed the anchor and cleaned the gunk off the pin so it slides in and out easily. Too easily. I am worried this pin could fall out and get lost? I left the pin and other metal hardware on the boat when I took it all apart. I suppose next spring I should drill a hole in the pin and run a short piece of aircraft cable through the hole to keep it from going missing?
With all wooden pulpit pieces in hand, I brought them home to work on.
It was in 4 pieces. I already glued 2 pieces together before I realised I should take a "before" picture.
While we are at it, take a look at the previous break that was "fixed" using deck caulk. Yikes!
Perfect alignment!!
Max I am confused.
If it will last a year or two, then why is it important to do it at all.
I am not sure about this. When I was searching for a replacement rudder, I looked at many rudders from twin-screw boats and found them to be considerably smaller than ones from a single screw- at least for my size boat. All the twin-screw rudders were unsupported. I am not a marine engineer but the differences were obvious. Twin screws did not need supports. Single screws did. My observation of the smaller rudders on twin screws would lead you to conclude that the bending forces that lead to fatigue failure would be considerably less than the larger plate single-screw rudder.But for the colours and finished condition, your photo of the recently located and returned rudder in post #34 could be of one of my 2 rudders. Neither of mine have ever been supported from below with a skeg, each of which have a prop powered by a 200 hp engine tossing wash towards it for hours on end, for a total of over 6000 hours to date, each of which is performing as designed, without pause.
Since you say your present solution will do for now, I would suggest that a skeg, since your boat apparently never had one, wouldn't add anything at all to the equation, so we should all stand down and let you get on with other, more urgent matters.
Max - I think that arrangement (in your photo) looks rather flexible and weak. It would probably hold some fore-aft load, but would not be good for the side loads. Furthermore, these side loads would only be transmitted into the main keel through the vertical bolts screwed into the keel bottom.
I much prefer the look of the photo that Pete posted which (to me) shows a U-shaped piece which engages with the bottom and sides of the keel. With appropriate filler compound (epoxy?) you will get a snug fit that transmits the side loads well. You will also have an extension that is stiff in the vertical direction. Notice the nice long length of keel/extension overlap.
My 0.02c
Nick
I much prefer the look of the photo that Pete posted which (to me) shows a U-shaped piece which engages with the bottom and sides of the keel.
Max, my advice is to just use the reassembled pulpit plank as a template and make up a new one out of a stout plank of good hard timber - this could be teak, but there are stronger timbers out there, some which could look ok varnished, but maybe there is no need for it to be varnished. Mine looks good painted white.
The important thing is for it to be one complete piece of timber, not one reassembled via glues and even metal fixations as well.
The bronze roller assembly however looks much like the original on mine, and I was able to insert a hinged stainless roller assembly inside that, using the sliding bolt you freed up to fix that hinged mount inside the original for added strength.
Thanks for that.This is our 1974 34 Marine Trader Europe. We removed the shoe to repair rot wet fiberglass.
Max, an impressive repair, and I see it involves fixing a previous repair. I may have missed it, but have you figured out why it failed to avoid the risk of another repair? If it`s just overload then it may be unavoidable unless you reduce the loading or ease off beforehand.
Now the fun part. Scraping of all that black goop from the wood fibres. This stuff feels like it has silicone in it.
(also if you look carefully, you can see the dowelling on a repair further up on the pulpit)
Max1
Don't mean to be to be pushy but this is the perfect application for the scraper I mentioned in another thread. It would also do a great job of stripping the old finish. The thought of trying to do that with a razor blade gives me the shivers . I suggest this with the utmost respect.
Rob