Knotinahurry
Member
- Joined
- Dec 14, 2008
- Messages
- 6
I am looking into replacing the diesel engine in my 25 foot trawler, I would like to know if any one has any advice regarding the Sabb Diesel 30 horse Power with a variable prop. I
30 Horspower Saab Diesel with a variable pitch prop
- Thread starter Knotinahurry
- Start date
The friendliest place on the web for anyone who enjoys boating.
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.
Nomad Willy
Guru
Robert,
Why on earth would you want an old Sabb engine w a heavy, complicated and perhaps troublesome vari-pitch prop. In theory the way to go is w vari-pitch prop but in the real world a nice modern engine and gear box** ..* well why would you not want that? Is your 25' trawler an Albin? I had one and can give you lots of opnions there,
Eric Henning
Why on earth would you want an old Sabb engine w a heavy, complicated and perhaps troublesome vari-pitch prop. In theory the way to go is w vari-pitch prop but in the real world a nice modern engine and gear box** ..* well why would you not want that? Is your 25' trawler an Albin? I had one and can give you lots of opnions there,
Eric Henning
FF
Guru
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2007
- Messages
- 22,552
The problem with the old Sabbs may be parts locating.
A heavy duty slow running engine with CPP is a good choice IF you run enough hours a year to need such efficency and reliability.
Yes there heavy , but it adds to the reliability that a 3200rpm flea like a Yanmar or Kubota could only dream of.
That said either Y or K are fine modern high speed diesels , with a proper selection and gear box they can do yachtie duty for a long time.Couple of hundred hours a year at cruise.
For replacement selection we use working "swept volume" to decide on the replacement size and cruise RPM.
Take the cubic inches of the old engine and multiply by the usual cruise RPM
Divide that number by the cubic inches of the replacement and you have the new required RPM at cruise.
Look in the makers site and see if you can run there cont, and if its at least 300rpm below the rated top rpm.
If it isn't , look at the next larger size.
3 Cyl will usually be smoother than 4 , as well as lighter.
Have you considered your own marinization (saves 1/2 to 2/3 of cost?)
Smaller engine cruise loaded to 80% is most desirable from a engine service life , but may not be enough to punch thru F 7 at normal cruise speeds.
FF
A heavy duty slow running engine with CPP is a good choice IF you run enough hours a year to need such efficency and reliability.
Yes there heavy , but it adds to the reliability that a 3200rpm flea like a Yanmar or Kubota could only dream of.
That said either Y or K are fine modern high speed diesels , with a proper selection and gear box they can do yachtie duty for a long time.Couple of hundred hours a year at cruise.
For replacement selection we use working "swept volume" to decide on the replacement size and cruise RPM.
Take the cubic inches of the old engine and multiply by the usual cruise RPM
Divide that number by the cubic inches of the replacement and you have the new required RPM at cruise.
Look in the makers site and see if you can run there cont, and if its at least 300rpm below the rated top rpm.
If it isn't , look at the next larger size.
3 Cyl will usually be smoother than 4 , as well as lighter.
Have you considered your own marinization (saves 1/2 to 2/3 of cost?)
Smaller engine cruise loaded to 80% is most desirable from a engine service life , but may not be enough to punch thru F 7 at normal cruise speeds.
FF
I would echo Eric's question.* If one was talking about a cruise ship or a tug or a ferry a variable pitch prop would probably be the most efficient way to go.* But we're talking about a 25' boat here.* If there's anything that warrants the KISS principle it's this.*
I don't know enough to suggest what sort of engines are ideal or available for this type of boat, but I agree with Eric that a nice, simple, reliable diesel mated to a basic marine gear, propshaft, and prop*would be the far more cost-effective and reliable way to go.* Given the size of the boat, whatever efficiency*might be realized from the use a variable-pitch prop will pobably be measured by very small*fractions of a gallon per hour, and this minimal savings*will probably be more than wiped out by the maintenance and potential problems generated by the drive train.*
The more moving parts you have, the more you increase the chances for a failure or problem.* This is why jet engines are WAY more reliable than piston engines.* You have two or three primary*moving parts depending on the engine type, versus--- well, I don't know how many if you include pistons, valves, camshafts, rocker arms, etc.*
-- Edited by Marin on Friday 28th of August 2009 11:32:35 AM
FF
Guru
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2007
- Messages
- 22,552
One thought that may make some of the folks that never lived with a gas engine may have a hissy fit ,
But why diesel?? If the boat does under 200-250 hours a year.
Gas has all the advantages , cost , quiet , cheap to service , easy to service in the size engine this boat needs.
My guess would be 10 hp ,under 1/2 gph in diesel or 5/6 gph in gasoline.
An electric start Honda with factory gear reduction would be under $2k.
The fuel could be kept in outboard 12g tanks , and emptied into the owners car at the end of any cruising.
Just a thought.
But why diesel?? If the boat does under 200-250 hours a year.
Gas has all the advantages , cost , quiet , cheap to service , easy to service in the size engine this boat needs.
My guess would be 10 hp ,under 1/2 gph in diesel or 5/6 gph in gasoline.
An electric start Honda with factory gear reduction would be under $2k.
The fuel could be kept in outboard 12g tanks , and emptied into the owners car at the end of any cruising.
Just a thought.
FF
Guru
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2007
- Messages
- 22,552
"Ten horsepower on a 26 foot boat?"
Well it is assumed its a displacement boat , so huge additions of power only make waves and heat the ocean
A 26 ft boat woulds be hard pressed to get a 25 ft LWL so 5K , 6mph is the economical cruise .
I assume the boat would weigh under 12,000lbs , @ 2240 per ton , under 5 tons.
2 Hp per ton is a reasonable cruise with 3HP ton* (50% more fuel burn )would only get to near hull speed , another 1K
To go fast , in this boat would require a SL of over 3 , pure plaining , so were looking for a* hundredHP not ten.
3 times the speed , with a displacement hull shape , probably 10X the fuel burn, just means someone bought the wrong boat.
-- Edited by FF on Saturday 29th of August 2009 04:20:20 AM
Well it is assumed its a displacement boat , so huge additions of power only make waves and heat the ocean
A 26 ft boat woulds be hard pressed to get a 25 ft LWL so 5K , 6mph is the economical cruise .
I assume the boat would weigh under 12,000lbs , @ 2240 per ton , under 5 tons.
2 Hp per ton is a reasonable cruise with 3HP ton* (50% more fuel burn )would only get to near hull speed , another 1K
To go fast , in this boat would require a SL of over 3 , pure plaining , so were looking for a* hundredHP not ten.
3 times the speed , with a displacement hull shape , probably 10X the fuel burn, just means someone bought the wrong boat.
-- Edited by FF on Saturday 29th of August 2009 04:20:20 AM
Knotinahurry
Member
- Joined
- Dec 14, 2008
- Messages
- 6
Thank you for your input. After reading the suggestions and comments I will abandon the old saab diesel and investigate a more tradional power train for the boat. I will look at yanmar, kubota, and volvo diesel engines ranging in horsepower from 18 to 30 driving a one inch stainless steel shaft with a prop in the range of 12/14 or a if possible a 12/16, hull speed is said to be 10k that I cannot confirm at this time. The vessel is a Hercules trawler designed by Glen-L the boat measures between 24 and 25 feet and weighs approximately 5500 lbs loaded with water and fuel. I would like to attain a cruise speed between 8 and 10 knots at 2800 rpm any slower and it limits my travel. I am running out of Lake Ontario from Hamilton Harbour which is on the south west tip of Lake Ontario. I travel from Hamilton to Niagara on the lake, and Toronto island, to cover this distance it takes 4 to 5 hours at 5 to 5.5 knots I am desperately looking for a little more speed, 8 to 10 knots would make me happy.
-- Edited by Knotinahurry on Saturday 29th of August 2009 07:35:30 AM
-- Edited by Knotinahurry on Saturday 29th of August 2009 07:35:30 AM
RickB
Scraping Paint
- Joined
- Oct 20, 2007
- Messages
- 3,804
- Vessel Make
- CHB 48 Zodiac YL 4.2
"Take the cubic inches of the old engine and multiply by the usual cruise RPM ..."
If memory serves,*the term for that kind of calculation is aruspicy.
If memory serves,*the term for that kind of calculation is aruspicy.
Gulf Comanche
Guru
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2007
- Messages
- 1,049
- Location
- U.S.A.
- Vessel Name
- Old School
- Vessel Make
- 38' Trawler custom built by Hike Metal Products
Aruspicy:
Also haruspicy. The ancient Druidic, Etruscan and Roman practice of examining the entrails, mainly the liver (hepatoscopy), of sacrificial animals for purposes of divination; frequent part of augury performed by a specialised priest, the Aruspex. Mention of it also occurs in the Old Testament (Ezekiel 21:21) in regard to practices of non-Hebrew tribes, including the Egyptians.
The practice ceased with the establishment of Christianity as the state religion of Rome but until then it was popular with people who could afford to sacrifice (the animal was naturally eaten afterwards) and given great heed by emperors and generals. It may have lasted longer in north-western Europe which wasn't christianised until much later. In modern times, there's limited use of this practice in association with voodoo.
Some practitioners used human entrails and this widely illegal practice of (anthropomancy) is recorded as late as the fourth century CE but may have been part of the black arts in later times.
Also haruspicy. The ancient Druidic, Etruscan and Roman practice of examining the entrails, mainly the liver (hepatoscopy), of sacrificial animals for purposes of divination; frequent part of augury performed by a specialised priest, the Aruspex. Mention of it also occurs in the Old Testament (Ezekiel 21:21) in regard to practices of non-Hebrew tribes, including the Egyptians.
The practice ceased with the establishment of Christianity as the state religion of Rome but until then it was popular with people who could afford to sacrifice (the animal was naturally eaten afterwards) and given great heed by emperors and generals. It may have lasted longer in north-western Europe which wasn't christianised until much later. In modern times, there's limited use of this practice in association with voodoo.
Some practitioners used human entrails and this widely illegal practice of (anthropomancy) is recorded as late as the fourth century CE but may have been part of the black arts in later times.
RickB
Scraping Paint
- Joined
- Oct 20, 2007
- Messages
- 3,804
- Vessel Make
- CHB 48 Zodiac YL 4.2
"The ancient Druidic, Etruscan and Roman practice of examining the entrails ..."
Yeah, that's it, that's what I meant to say.
Yeah, that's it, that's what I meant to say.
Nomad Willy
Guru
Robert,
I did some research on your behalf. I had a 25' Albin for a number of years and have seen about 30 of them in a club. The Albin 25 is about exactly the same size and displacement as the GL Hercules. I looked at their website and they show no hull lines so I'm not shure but I suspect It's too much of a displacement hull to get you very close to 10 knots cruise. The Albins had a power range of 22 to 44hp. My own Albin had a 34hp Yanmar w 1 1/8" shaft and 15" propeller. I could get a bit over 10 knots WOT. When I first owned the boat I ran it at 8.5 knots most all the time (2750 rpm on a 3450 rpm max). Later I ran the boat to Alaska and back at 2425 rpm and 7.3 knots. We looked at a Glen L 28' Jolly Rodger that had a 4-107 Perkins. The Willard we bought had a Perkins 4-107 also. I took out the Perkins and installed a 37 hp Mitsubishi. The same engine is availible in a 33 hp version (destroked). The 33 hp Mitsu is the smallest 4 cyl engine availible. Other engines you may consider or that I have considered are, 33 or 42 hp Vetus, 32 hp Isusu, 27 hp Yanmar, 44 hp Westerbeke and perhaps Volvo. The engine you need is within a very narrow power range** .. very close to 35 hp. The Westerbeke 44, the Vetus 42 and the Klassen 37 hp engines are all the exact same engine** ..* Mitsu 4 cyl w 107 cu in 78x92 mm bore/stroke. Volvo engines are very good and very popular in Europe but parts prices may be high in the US. Universal did have a 42 hp Kabota but no more. Beta (England) offers Kabota engines marinized. There are lots of engines just below 30 hp and lots just above 40 hp but very few about 35 hp. That was my delema. If you use a 3 cyl eng in a light boat you may want to consider an Aqua Drive and very soft mounts.
What is your highest concern reguarding the engine, cost, weight, power, smoothness, fuel burn or what? Since you already have the boat you may need to consider the shaft offset.
Eric Henning
-- Edited by nomadwilly on Saturday 29th of August 2009 06:45:32 PM
I did some research on your behalf. I had a 25' Albin for a number of years and have seen about 30 of them in a club. The Albin 25 is about exactly the same size and displacement as the GL Hercules. I looked at their website and they show no hull lines so I'm not shure but I suspect It's too much of a displacement hull to get you very close to 10 knots cruise. The Albins had a power range of 22 to 44hp. My own Albin had a 34hp Yanmar w 1 1/8" shaft and 15" propeller. I could get a bit over 10 knots WOT. When I first owned the boat I ran it at 8.5 knots most all the time (2750 rpm on a 3450 rpm max). Later I ran the boat to Alaska and back at 2425 rpm and 7.3 knots. We looked at a Glen L 28' Jolly Rodger that had a 4-107 Perkins. The Willard we bought had a Perkins 4-107 also. I took out the Perkins and installed a 37 hp Mitsubishi. The same engine is availible in a 33 hp version (destroked). The 33 hp Mitsu is the smallest 4 cyl engine availible. Other engines you may consider or that I have considered are, 33 or 42 hp Vetus, 32 hp Isusu, 27 hp Yanmar, 44 hp Westerbeke and perhaps Volvo. The engine you need is within a very narrow power range** .. very close to 35 hp. The Westerbeke 44, the Vetus 42 and the Klassen 37 hp engines are all the exact same engine** ..* Mitsu 4 cyl w 107 cu in 78x92 mm bore/stroke. Volvo engines are very good and very popular in Europe but parts prices may be high in the US. Universal did have a 42 hp Kabota but no more. Beta (England) offers Kabota engines marinized. There are lots of engines just below 30 hp and lots just above 40 hp but very few about 35 hp. That was my delema. If you use a 3 cyl eng in a light boat you may want to consider an Aqua Drive and very soft mounts.
What is your highest concern reguarding the engine, cost, weight, power, smoothness, fuel burn or what? Since you already have the boat you may need to consider the shaft offset.
Eric Henning
-- Edited by nomadwilly on Saturday 29th of August 2009 06:45:32 PM
FF
Guru
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2007
- Messages
- 22,552
"Take the cubic inches of the old engine and multiply by the usual cruise RPM ..."
"If memory serves, the term for that kind of calculation is aruspicy."
Actually its a measure of WORK ,the swept volume (displacement) of the engine times the RPM.
A thought that has not yet put forward is to keep the usually efficient and trouble free CPP and just stick in a replacement motor.
A bellhousing adapter might be needed to be Mfg , but that's hardly a problem.
At only 5500lbs the boat is nice and light , only about 2 1/2 tons or so.
With 10hp to 15hp per ton the wake drag will probably be really high but well above displacement speed may be possible.
The usual problem is the stern will sink further and further , although Herrishof used a retrofitted mounted set of horizontal fins to counter this on his canoe sterned , overpowered boats.
Might work for your boat?
3 cyl are* balanced by their design ,
to get a 4 cyl smooth usually takes a special counter shaft and operation with certain speeds restricted.
So an Aquadrive and soft mounts are a needed* addition to a 4 banger ,
but hardly needed on a smoother 3.
We installed Volvo MD3B is various boats and the soft mounts were no smoother (but they were* quieter) than the workboat style bolted down.
-- Edited by FF on Sunday 30th of August 2009 05:47:40 AM
"If memory serves, the term for that kind of calculation is aruspicy."
Actually its a measure of WORK ,the swept volume (displacement) of the engine times the RPM.
A thought that has not yet put forward is to keep the usually efficient and trouble free CPP and just stick in a replacement motor.
A bellhousing adapter might be needed to be Mfg , but that's hardly a problem.
At only 5500lbs the boat is nice and light , only about 2 1/2 tons or so.
With 10hp to 15hp per ton the wake drag will probably be really high but well above displacement speed may be possible.
The usual problem is the stern will sink further and further , although Herrishof used a retrofitted mounted set of horizontal fins to counter this on his canoe sterned , overpowered boats.
Might work for your boat?
3 cyl are* balanced by their design ,
to get a 4 cyl smooth usually takes a special counter shaft and operation with certain speeds restricted.
So an Aquadrive and soft mounts are a needed* addition to a 4 banger ,
but hardly needed on a smoother 3.
We installed Volvo MD3B is various boats and the soft mounts were no smoother (but they were* quieter) than the workboat style bolted down.
-- Edited by FF on Sunday 30th of August 2009 05:47:40 AM
Capt Dan
Senior Member
If you are abandoning the Sabb, what is to become of it?** These are monuments to Cast Iron, and last forever.* Slow turning is the way to go, and why not have something to fiddle with.* And don't forget, if you like the concept of the adjustable pitch but have been talked out of the Sabb, you can fit it to a newer diesel.
Who would seriously put a gas engine in a boat anyway?
Who would seriously put a gas engine in a boat anyway?
FF
Guru
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2007
- Messages
- 22,552
"Who would seriously put a gas engine in a boat anyway?"
Anyone that wanted to lower the yearly cost of operation that runs the usual yacht 100 -200 hours of operation.
The engine cost is a fraction of most diesels ('cept used diesels).
The oil is std , not more expensive , there is NO underloading hassles from light loads , parts are usually 1/10 the cost of diesel , and anyone can fix them with the usual tool box.
The ease of proper winter storage (drain the carb vs insert preserving fuel into the injection system) and many other low cost procedures make gas the first choice for a limited time coastal cruiser. The great lakes is gas boat heaven .(3 or 4 month season)
The usual downfall of gas is the limited Hp for folks that really need say 250hp+.
Not many trawler guys cruising at that power level.
FF
Anyone that wanted to lower the yearly cost of operation that runs the usual yacht 100 -200 hours of operation.
The engine cost is a fraction of most diesels ('cept used diesels).
The oil is std , not more expensive , there is NO underloading hassles from light loads , parts are usually 1/10 the cost of diesel , and anyone can fix them with the usual tool box.
The ease of proper winter storage (drain the carb vs insert preserving fuel into the injection system) and many other low cost procedures make gas the first choice for a limited time coastal cruiser. The great lakes is gas boat heaven .(3 or 4 month season)
The usual downfall of gas is the limited Hp for folks that really need say 250hp+.
Not many trawler guys cruising at that power level.
FF
Capt Dan
Senior Member
Hi FF,
Just checking to see who is out there.**
Unfortunately you are right, not many are doing much cruising, mostly sitting at the marina at best.
Most probably are so overpowered that is all they can afford to do.
Capt Dan
Just checking to see who is out there.**
Unfortunately you are right, not many are doing much cruising, mostly sitting at the marina at best.
Most probably are so overpowered that is all they can afford to do.
Capt Dan
Nomad Willy
Guru
Very good Fred,
I'm buyin this 100%. Would like to add two really big reasons to go gas. smoothness and quietness. These are huge issues on a yacht and the reasons I would have for converting to gas if I did. Another big item w the women is smell.
Eric Henning
I'm buyin this 100%. Would like to add two really big reasons to go gas. smoothness and quietness. These are huge issues on a yacht and the reasons I would have for converting to gas if I did. Another big item w the women is smell.
Eric Henning
FF
Guru
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2007
- Messages
- 22,552
The biggest downside on a gas boat is the Gov mandated gas with alcohol added.
The storage life is so short movable (6 or 12) gal tanks , and draining into the car is the only solution.
The storage life is so short movable (6 or 12) gal tanks , and draining into the car is the only solution.
Marc1
Veteran Member
I love the old Sabb I could sleep to that engine sound all night.
As for DIY marinization, I suggest Kubota V1505 35HP 4 Cyl, or V2203 50HP.
Cheap enough to buy brand new and several suppliers off the shelv marinisation kits and an engine that will keep on running for decades.
[video=[MEDIA=youtube]efPJqfl5kPs[/MEDIA]]
Of course you could alwasy try to find one of these. A bit slow to start though
[video=[MEDIA=youtube]t44dwcUcYlk[/MEDIA]]
-- Edited by Marc1 on Monday 5th of October 2009 01:22:44 AM
FF
Guru
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2007
- Messages
- 22,552
Have you considered your own marinization (saves 1/2 to 2/3 of cost?)
LOVE IT ! My favorite engine is the Intl DT 466.
Nice at 75 to 150 hp , DIRT cheap in the truck werckers and depending on the year chosen , electric or mechanical and turboed aftercooled or NA is your choice.
Same basic engine in the smaller DT 360 .
A couple of times a year the complete rebuild kit is $799 and thats a nice way to get a Zero time engine at low cost.
Downside 1200lbs or so plus tranny..
FF
LOVE IT ! My favorite engine is the Intl DT 466.
Nice at 75 to 150 hp , DIRT cheap in the truck werckers and depending on the year chosen , electric or mechanical and turboed aftercooled or NA is your choice.
Same basic engine in the smaller DT 360 .
A couple of times a year the complete rebuild kit is $799 and thats a nice way to get a Zero time engine at low cost.
Downside 1200lbs or so plus tranny..
FF
Marc1
Veteran Member
Hi there!
Here are two suppliers of marinsing kits for Kubota Both in Australia yet shipping of parts shouldn't be a drama. You can research suppliers in the US. If we have two you must have half a dozen.
http://www.diecon.com.au/index.html
www.wm-marine-diesel.com/
Another supplier of marinization parts yet not for Kubota is Lancing Marine in the UK
www.lancingmarine.com/
Sorry I don't know why the link does not work, jus copy and past in your search engine
-- Edited by Marc1 on Tuesday 6th of October 2009 03:36:06 AM
-- Edited by Marc1 on Tuesday 6th of October 2009 03:52:09 AM
Here are two suppliers of marinsing kits for Kubota Both in Australia yet shipping of parts shouldn't be a drama. You can research suppliers in the US. If we have two you must have half a dozen.
http://www.diecon.com.au/index.html
www.wm-marine-diesel.com/
Another supplier of marinization parts yet not for Kubota is Lancing Marine in the UK
www.lancingmarine.com/
Sorry I don't know why the link does not work, jus copy and past in your search engine
-- Edited by Marc1 on Tuesday 6th of October 2009 03:36:06 AM
-- Edited by Marc1 on Tuesday 6th of October 2009 03:52:09 AM
Marc1
Veteran Member
International, I agree, nice simple cheap engine. Not as nice as a rebuilt and polished Gardner but surely more practical.
http://www.internationaldelivers.com/site_layout/engine/dt466detail.asp
http://www.internationaldelivers.com/site_layout/engine/dt466detail.asp
FF
Guru
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2007
- Messages
- 22,552
Not as nice as a rebuilt and polished Gardner but surely more practical.
And at least a ton lighter.
And at least a ton lighter.
I realize this is an old post but I cannot resist commenting on the Sabb variable pitch prop comments.* Arguing that a transmission is less complex than a Sabb variable pitch prop is not accurate.* The Sabb propellor is quite simple and controlled by moving the prop shaft fore and aft which changes propellor pitch via a simple pin and block assembly.* There are no complicated moving parts.* The only maintenance is changing the plastic thrust washers every few years and a shot of grease every morning.
The system does generate comments that "you left your boat in gear!!".
The system does generate comments that "you left your boat in gear!!".
FF
Guru
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2007
- Messages
- 22,552
Interesting that the simplest concept , yank the engine and get it PROPERLY rebuilt was never even considered.
A 600lb box to Sweden and back , by ship is not that expensive.
If a factory new went 30-40 years , the usually more reliable rebuilt should do better.
A 600lb box to Sweden and back , by ship is not that expensive.
If a factory new went 30-40 years , the usually more reliable rebuilt should do better.
Capt Dan
Senior Member
Reading the original post,** I don't think he was replacing his sabb,** just thinking about replacing with a Sabb.
I'm not even sure that Sabb still makes the engine.** Last I heard was that in order to use their variable pitch stuff, you had to use a more modern high speed engine and gear it down first,* then couple to the variable stuff.
In any event,* I have tried contacting the Sabb US dealer in FLA several times and never have I gotten a response.
Dan Pease
I'm not even sure that Sabb still makes the engine.** Last I heard was that in order to use their variable pitch stuff, you had to use a more modern high speed engine and gear it down first,* then couple to the variable stuff.
In any event,* I have tried contacting the Sabb US dealer in FLA several times and never have I gotten a response.
Dan Pease
