MarinI think a photo would be required, but remind me when we're at Sucia.*Marin wrote:
Carey--- Wrong discussion for this but you gotta tell these folks about your "portable" power and water connection.
This "big" boat leaving Victoria, BC towing its "tender" may have been one of smaller ones you saw.Carey wrote:
We had reservationplans at a hotel/marina in Victoria for an August weekend, and as I passed there a couple weeks beforehand, I noticed only seventy and eighty footers throughout the marina. Imagining we would appear so small amongst them, I had my wife make us a sign to go over our vessel name on the transom. It read "Tender to", in the same colors as the vessel name. As it turned out, the prior weekend had been a fluke, and the weekend we were there was mostly same size vessels to our own.*
*
This "big" boat leaving Victoria, BC towing its "tender" may have been one of smaller ones you saw.markpierce wrote:
*
Carey wrote:
We had reservationplans at a hotel/marina in Victoria for an August weekend, and as I passed there a couple weeks beforehand, I noticed only seventy and eighty footers throughout the marina. Imagining we would appear so small amongst them, I had my wife make us a sign to go over our vessel name on the transom. It read "Tender to", in the same colors as the vessel name. As it turned out, the prior weekend had been a fluke, and the weekend we were there was mostly same size vessels to our own.*
*
Here's a photo of my Coot looking to the forward section of the saloon, with the desk to the left.* (Wood finishing isn't complete.)markpierce wrote:
An office?* Maybe*you're why the standard saloon option includes a desk.* A fellow in Seattle is also having a Coot built.* Instead of a desk, he's getting a house-sized freezer/refrigerator.
Why does West Marine say this about the Lifesling 2 and 3*on its internet catalog: "USCG Type: Type V which substitutes for a Type IV"?koliver wrote:
I have always liked lifeslings. I think they make a lot more sense than rings, especialy for getting a hypothermic victim aboard. Unfortunately, the Coast Guard doesn't approve them, so you also have to carry a ring, and if your boat is bigger, with a self illuminating light, and with a 15m floating line. So the Lifesling is relegated to the options list, not the necessaries. We (CCGA inspectors) do approve the lifesling as a stand alone throwing line, so long as its line is long enough.
Why does West Marine say this about the Lifesling 2 and 3*on its internet catalog: "USCG Type: Type V which substitutes for a Type IV"?My guess is because it is actually classified as a Type V, which means it is designed and approved for a specific purpose (shown on it's label), but it meets the requirement that every vessel over 16' is required to carry a Type IV throwable device.markpierce wrote:koliver wrote:
I have always liked lifeslings. I think they make a lot more sense than rings, especialy for getting a hypothermic victim aboard. Unfortunately, the Coast Guard doesn't approve them, so you also have to carry a ring, and if your boat is bigger, with a self illuminating light, and with a 15m floating line. So the Lifesling is relegated to the options list, not the necessaries. We (CCGA inspectors) do approve the lifesling as a stand alone throwing line, so long as its line is long enough.
*too often I say the opposite of intended: left vs. right, east vs. west, etc.Per wrote:
i was wondering too since you mentioned transatlantic but really you probably meant transpacific.. unless it is going all the way around the other way and thru the canal, but i figure thats unlikely..
is she 100% complete now?
My Coot will also have that "stupid simulated funnel."* I was thinking of asking the builder not be install one, but I learned that's where the propane tank is placed.markpierce wrote:nomadwilly wrote:
*and it has a stupid simulated funnel just like the Eagle.
*Walt, you beat me to it.* Following the process with Mark has been fascinating.* I ordered a trawler built in Tiawan*at the Blue Seas Yard in 1981.* It came in as ordered, but it was much harder to get progress updates.* However the boat was good, and we enjoyed it.* It looks like Mark will have many years of great cruising ahead.SeaHorse II wrote:
Mark:
I can't thank you enough for bringing the Forum along for the ride. It's been, for me, the most interesting part of the Forum since you started this project. We get to see the whole process, pimples and all. (We do see all the pimples and warts don't we?)*