Question:
Seems like the height restrictions are all in the Champlain canal for the most part. Would it be prudent to put the mast down and leave it down for all of them. My mast is a bitch to lower.
Unless you have something you really need it up for along the way, I'd drop it before the Champlain Canal and just leave it down until you're past the last low spot. What's your height with the mast up vs down?
Mast up19.135 ft
Mast Down, Bimini up 16 ft 3 in.
Looks like there a few bridges under 20 feet throughout the length of the canal, so I'd plan to just drop it in Waterford (nothing under 25 feet up to that point and keep it down until the other end. Looking at the note for bridges C-5 and C-5A, you should check on water level at that point, as it may need to be lowered (or you'd have to drop the bimini).
https://www.canals.ny.gov/boating/bridgeheights.html#champlain
Those charts don't seem to tell what the current level is. Is there a site where one can get that?
All,
Will be cruising Lake Champlain this summer, most likely in June.
Looking for neat places to see, good anchorages and things I might want to avoid.
Heading up on the Hudson to get there. Looks like a pretty good hike up the Champlain river/canal..... anything exciting there?
Then heading up to Montreal..... if Canada open.
Thoughts?
BTW information only - I did not see it mentioned but Y Valve must be completely removed on Lake Champlain. Closed and locked does not comply.
That said, all other comments about the lake and trip.are true. Enjoy
Most boats don't fully disconnect. I just remove the handle. I called CG-Station Burlington, they said that's fine.
Without looking it up, I think the wording is that the hose from the holding tank to the overboard thru-hull must be physically removed. That said, I don't know how many boats actually comply with that, but when I purchased my boat on Lake Champlain, everything was connected and funtional. At the time, it had been operated that way for 8 years on the lake. I don't boat there so I don't know how much it is enforced. My surveyor told me not to worry about it during my delivery trip and if stopped to tell the officer that I am in the process of moving the boat off the lake.
I bought my boat on the upper Hudson in Albany. It spent a lot of it's life on Lake Champlain. I was initially curious why it had a fitting that would disconnect the hose leading to the overboard discharge and another fitting that would cap it off. I guess there are some boaters that do comply.
The black water disconnected hose thing has been discussed extensive on the Great Loop Association forum. It's state law, not federal. Since the CG doesn't enforce state laws, they will understandably say it's fine if you meet the federal guidelines which accept removed valve handles, zip tied handles, key locks and key switches, etc. Any problems will be with state law enforcement.
I don't recall all the details, but there was a strong argument that VT's law is illegal since it conflicts with federal law. Champlain is a federal waterway, and if a state wants more poop protection than is otherwise offered by federal laws, they can appeal to be an NDZ. But an NDZ is clearly defined, as are the acceptable ways to "secure" you black water discharge. But of course unless you are willing and able to challenge the state law, what are you going to do? When we were cruising the inland waters we ended up deciding to skip Vermont mostly because of this. I say that sadly because I'm a Vermont resident and would like to encourage visiting boaters, not discourage them.
All this was a good 10 years ago, and at the time many people were reporting being inspected and fined for not having their discharge hoses physically disconnected. It doesn't sound like anyone here has recently had any issues, so perhaps the state withdrew the law, or has stopped enforcing it.
The black water disconnected hose thing has been discussed extensive on the Great Loop Association forum. It's state law, not federal. Since the CG doesn't enforce state laws, they will understandably say it's fine if you meet the federal guidelines which accept removed valve handles, zip tied handles, key locks and key switches, etc. Any problems will be with state law enforcement.
I don't recall all the details, but there was a strong argument that VT's law is illegal since it conflicts with federal law. Champlain is a federal waterway, and if a state wants more poop protection than is otherwise offered by federal laws, they can appeal to be an NDZ. But an NDZ is clearly defined, as are the acceptable ways to "secure" you black water discharge. But of course unless you are willing and able to challenge the state law, what are you going to do? When we were cruising the inland waters we ended up deciding to skip Vermont mostly because of this. I say that sadly because I'm a Vermont resident and would like to encourage visiting boaters, not discourage them.
All this was a good 10 years ago, and at the time many people were reporting being inspected and fined for not having their discharge hoses physically disconnected. It doesn't sound like anyone here has recently had any issues, so perhaps the state withdrew the law, or has stopped enforcing it.
BobAs far as I know it is still law, maybe just not enforced unless you are stopped for other stupid behavior and they want to pile on. I actually found somewhere in VT law that even gray water discharge is illegal, but nobody I talked to ever heard of that so I'm pretty sure it's not an issue.
I wonder if this faux-NDZ state law would also prohibit the discharge of treated waste from an MSD such as a Purasan?