Why do builder insist on building bigger and bigger. My 1989 Nordhavn 46, with active stabilizers, was a great size. I reworked the forward stateroom, put in a larger bow thruster, reworked the existing instrumentation. It was a great boat until the boat yard dropped it off the jacks, opened up a huge hole on the port size by driving the stabilizer into the owner's stateroom = constructive loss.
Yea I know. They are beautiful and seaworthy boat. The purchase price is more than high enough but then the price of the various electronic "add ons" may add maybe another $50K.
I read, the 43 actually traveled to Bermuda, in the company of other/larger Nordhavns. The 43 was re-fueled underway, as necessary, from a larger Norhavn via a garden hose and a pump.
I am getting too old to start with another boat. Start with active stabilizers.
The disadvantage and advantage is, they only go about 8 knts but, can travel great distances without refueling.
I think I will stick with an American Tug, a fast trawler.