backinblue
Guru
- Joined
- Jan 29, 2019
- Messages
- 3,938
- Location
- USA
- Vessel Name
- Blue Moon
- Vessel Make
- Mainship Pilot 355
I think SeaLife makes some very good points in his post.
2019 pricing on the yard we are wanting to get to here
$700 US in and out
$30 US day on hard
$30 US a day labour
l ::: Phithak Shipyard and Services :: Satun Thailand
If my boat bottom or structure was questionable I don't think I would cross an ocean. I get wanting good value, but not at the risk of sinking. Besides if you can cross the ocean with the bottom you have, you could probably go where you wanted in the first place.
Also would think the ocean crossing would cost much more than the savings (extra safety equipment, wear and tear, insurance, fuel, etc.)
That would be an incredible trip. I Probably wouldn't want to come back.So what I said was to get the boat into SOLID condition here (bottom, engine, running gear), then take off across the Pacific and have the aesthetic renovations done in SE Asia. The cost to take the OP's vessel aesthetically from its present state to the Romsdahl shown previously would be an easy half million in America. Probably cost 1/3 or 1/4 that in Indonesia, Thailand or Malaysia.
Regarding the cost of the trip, well, it's the journey, not the destination! I hope someone doesn't buy a 65ft bluewater boat just to cruise Puget Sound all day.
And no way to discover that without dismantling parts of the boatThis post is a follow up to my notes from earlier today.
The two attached photos illustrate problems that were only found after pulling a couple of planks and then removing all the interior paneling...
1. Removing a plank revealed that a couple of frames were missing. You could stick your arm into the cavity and feel the crumbling wood. This meant it was time to remove the interior paneling.
2. Removing the interior revealed that all the frames and planks in the area were bad. Lots of work to do.
This boat was being used 4 to 5 days a week, right up until entering the shipyard. I really thought that the owner was going to pull the plug, and that I was going to have to look for a new job...
And no way to discover that without dismantling parts of the boat
That's what I was thinking also. I have used them on airplane engines and they work okay. Guess you have to drill some holes in various places to pass it through maybe two holes one for an additional light if needed and one for the borescope. It would take a lot of holes to get a good visual on 65 feet of hull.Geez that's sobering. Maybe a boroscope could be used to get a visual on frames that are hidden? I've used a cheap one that connects to my phone wirelessly to look at steel fuel tanks; not the easiest thing to use, but it could certainly tell if a frame was missing!
And no way to discover that without dismantling parts of the boat
Would you mind sharing what the bill was for this work? Give me some idea what I should extrapolate from if things pretty much are not all that good.When we bought ours it was based on what we could see looked good and
there were a few areas that felt soft but the assumption was made it was cosmetic (soft decks, soft bulwarks, badly flaking varnish)
Reality has proven this mostly true with bulwarks out the underlying structure was fine and immediate repaired deck ply lifted underlying timbers were mostly fine.
Varnish was simply machine sanded and solid colour self priming paint rolled on.
This lift doing more of the decks -
Foredeck ok, one degraded plank replaced
Side decks worse than expected - we chased the rot aft until we ran out of boat, pulled all deck planking up from around midships aft, cut out several metres of side rub rail and replace a section of top plank before putting in new planks and then ply/epoxy deck.
Having this deck planking off allowed us to climb in and inspect a large section of inaccessible hull and all was in good condition.
Expected re-launch in a few days
It's been a long 5 weeks
I thought it was interesting that when they did the work on the bottom in November and knew they were selling it that they didn't have a survey done. I do want to ask the yard and did the work what they saw or if anyone even looked.I go back to your album pics showing bad planking areas. At the time these planks were off for replacement would have provided a perfect window to the underlying structure.
Had problems migrated beyond planks? Someone knows something...will the owner authorize the yard who did work to speak freely about what was seen?
Hi, I'm fairly new to the forum, and don't know how to find the photo album for the Ramsdahl you're considering... I'd really like to see it. Thanks. DBLI haven't visited it yet. I was going to this past weekend but had to cancel. So I'm going to see it this coming Sunday and my daughters go along cause she's the boss. I do have some pictures on my personal album if you look in there.
Hi, I'm fairly new to the forum, and don't know how to find the photo album for the Ramsdahl you're considering... I'd really like to see it. Thanks. DBL
Would you mind sharing what the bill was for this work? Give me some idea what I should extrapolate from if things pretty much are not all that good.
Right now I am going to pass on the boat. Too much I can't see and can't be inspected.@eclinden, after 18 pages of arguments, did you ever visit the boat with or without a surveyor???