Nomad Willy
Guru
Boat looks more like a serious vessel w/o the FB.
You seem bent on the most economical travel possible fuel-wise while engaging in a type of boating where the universal claim seems to be that fuel is the least part of expenses.
However, your boat will have no covered outdoor space. You can't live out in the sun for very long. Even if you don't like flybridges (personally I don't) at least it provides a semblance of a covered patio to enjoy the world.
I really appreciate this message. I've owned this boat for 2 1/2 years and have it set-up almost perfectly for liveaboard usage. Of course, there are MANY other boats I'd rather have, namely: Krogen 48 Whaleback, Krogen 42, Nordhavn 46, Diesel Duck 462, to name a few. I'm uneasy about spending that kind of money at this point in my life though (I'm younger). They're 4-10x what I paid for my current boat. I've looked strongly at the Pilgrim 40s. I like the style, the hull shape, the efficiency, etc. But even a Pilgrim 40 is around an $80k premium over what I paid for my Bristol.
So all that to say, I'm still in the exploration phase. That means I'm spending a lot of time with Microsoft Paint and seeing if I can live with how the boat would look. If I decide to remove it, I'd convert the aft deck to the main lounge area, so that alleviates the socializing/entertaining issue some. I'll also spend the next few months driving exclusively from inside. These things should help inform the decision.
Oh, about the solar bimini - I'm just not comfortable putting so much weight that high up. Even a bimini over the aft deck isn't too appealing to me. But I haven't ruled this idea out...
Thanks. I've thought about covered outdoor space. The aft deck would HAVE to be covered, for sure. My idea was to hang a sun-shade from the boom. In addition (and unrelated to sun protection), I'd add stanchions and wind deflector panels around the aft deck. I actually modified a picture of "Islander", a different Bristol 42, to have no fly bridge. Islander has a picnic table and protected lounge area on the aft deck.
And you all are going to laugh at me for saying this, but I haven't entirely ruled out operating the boat from the aft deck. I can see over the main salon roof from the aft deck easily (if there was no FB). My boat can be steered from my cell phone or a tablet (pypilot and opencpn). I would just need to instrument the mechanical throttle controls and transmissions so they can be controlled remotely. Or just deal with having to run inside if I needed to change an engine setting. Of course, this mode of operation would be on long transits with low traffic density in calm weather.
There must be 3 feet of deck aft. Probably lose 10" installing the wheel. Then you will be driving from the back walking side to side to see where you are going, unable to see past the main cabin where there is a functional helm station.
Removing a perfectly good flybridge to install solar.
Then you will install a roof, canvass most likely 6'? high. The lines sure will be complimentary. Salloon roof, aft cabin lower roof and then another higher roof.
Yup, I can see dozens copying the idea.
To avoid any misunderstanding, I think you have lost it. IMHO
We don't need no stinkin' flybridge.
OK, aft deck above aft cabin. The pictures you attached make sense now to what you meant to say.I should mention again, this boat has a similar layout to what we're talking about here. Of course, really different lines (and dang is it beautiful).
OK, aft deck above aft cabin. The pictures you attached make sense now to what you meant to say.
$10-15K? for that conversion is not worth it for me to succeed in having a place to mount solar panels
I will surely miss the flybridge - it's where all the guests congregate when we're underway, but I'm willing to make the sacrifice for added energy independence, lower C.G., and easier fitting of headsail and paravanes.
I absolutely love the look of trawlers without the flybridge - what my husband and I affectionately call "The Shower Cap." But you're right about the guest congregation. We have a sedan model and you can't sit in the cockpit underway because the low pressure area sucks the exhaust into it and carbon monoxide poisoning becomes a real issue. There's a MT 38 in our marina that took his off and did exactly what you're proposing and it's a sweet deal. Maybe some day when we get too old to do the ladder to the flybridge we'll bite the bullet and do it.
Snip.....
But in order to replace a generator with solar, I think you need at least a 2kW array, and even that will only allow operation of a single air con for a few hours each day to still be neutral on power budget. If you're moving the boat each day though, and run for at least 4-6 hours, the battery bank, solar, and alternator system allows for all air con units to be run nightly for 2-3 hours (albeit with a depleted battery bank in the morning). I believe a 2kW array can replace a generator if done right (and the vessel is in the right geographic location). That's sort of where my thinking is. It's more than just a desire to just add a little bit of solar to my system. It's a gen replacement.
Back in 2013 I did the generator replacement thing. Removed a 7.5kW Onan and installed 1920W solar (7 x260W Suniva panels) along with 1284Ah house bank @ 12V. In 2016 I did a rework of the solar to reduce shading issues, going with 6 x 345 Sunpower panels (higher efficiency panels). Late last year I replaced the house bank, going to 1700Ah @ 12V. A week or so ago I finished another panel mod, relocating existing panels slightly to fit 2 additional panels, and mounting 4 of the panels on SS drawer slides to further limit shading at start and end of day. I also changed from 2 controllers having 3 panels each, to 4 controllers each having 2 panels. So I now have 2740W in total.
To touch on an earlier post, series connection is very bad when shaded, but parallel connected panels still suffer from shading, and its a much greater effect than just the shaded panel or part of panel ! I think that's because the MPPT has to lower voltage across all in that circuit if there is shading.
I spend anything from 100 -200 nights a year at anchor. While my former house bank was OK I did find myself moving after a few days to allow the 2 x 200A alternators to recover the bank's SOC during winter or if it was a bit cloudy. Or fire up the Honda portable. Now I think I have enough wattage and bank capacity to stay in one place almost indefinitely.
BUT for hot water I have engine heat loop plus a loop on the Webasto hydronic heating circuit. And I do not have aircon.
I think your plans are OK as far as power is concerned although IMO you are being way too optimistic to expect much aircon or water heating from the proposed solar wattage & house bank.
Overall IMO you will be better off buying a different boat than doing the flybridge removal and associated work.
Fantastic information. Thanks. Did you consider supplementing your solar array with wind turbines?
... i started out with panels flat and quickly learned when they are flat you are losing about 33 percent efficiency,being able to angle the panel made a such a significant change in power,something to consider
Looking good! Where does company socialize outdoors? Is there a natural gathering area?