Dougcole
Guru
We have synthetic teak flooring on our cabin soles, NuTeak, which is quite similar to Plasdeck. I love it for that installation, and have considered it for our cockpit. As I said, I had seadek for almost all of the exterior decks on the old boat, and have it in a few places on my flats boat. I also have Seadek on the treads of our FB stairs (also for our Lab) and strips of it on the gunnels of our Mainship where you typically step aboard.
Here is how I would compare the two:
The synthetic teak materials look much more like real teak. That's great in some applications, not so much in others. For instance, teak would look stupid on my poling platform, or as a random strip on a gunnel if there were no other teak decks on the boat. Seadek blends in more from an aesthetic standpoint.
Seadek provides considerably better traction than the synthetic teak products that I have seen. It's not just the texture, the softness helps as well.
The synthetic teak is more durable.
Synthetic teak is about twice the cost and considerably more complicated to install. Seadek can be cut from sheets or you can template the area you are covering and send it off to the company who will laser cut it for you, adding borders etc.
The decks on our old 1973 Gulfstar were in terrible shape cosmetically when we bought the boat. They likely had rot issues which were repaired by a PO. No rot was left, but they were VERY rough, uneven, discolored and downright ugly. A repair would have meant tackling a really big, somewhat costly project, which I was not ready to do on that boat at that time. So I covered them with Seadek. It looked and worked great. I think the roughness of the decks would have shown through plasteak unless I sanded and faired them.
You can get all kinds of colors and patterns in Seadek. Some of them are garish but different people have different tastes. It's not really meant to be an exact imitation of teak. As I said before, many people don't like the look of teak decks.
Both are good products, IMO.
Here is how I would compare the two:
The synthetic teak materials look much more like real teak. That's great in some applications, not so much in others. For instance, teak would look stupid on my poling platform, or as a random strip on a gunnel if there were no other teak decks on the boat. Seadek blends in more from an aesthetic standpoint.
Seadek provides considerably better traction than the synthetic teak products that I have seen. It's not just the texture, the softness helps as well.
The synthetic teak is more durable.
Synthetic teak is about twice the cost and considerably more complicated to install. Seadek can be cut from sheets or you can template the area you are covering and send it off to the company who will laser cut it for you, adding borders etc.
The decks on our old 1973 Gulfstar were in terrible shape cosmetically when we bought the boat. They likely had rot issues which were repaired by a PO. No rot was left, but they were VERY rough, uneven, discolored and downright ugly. A repair would have meant tackling a really big, somewhat costly project, which I was not ready to do on that boat at that time. So I covered them with Seadek. It looked and worked great. I think the roughness of the decks would have shown through plasteak unless I sanded and faired them.
You can get all kinds of colors and patterns in Seadek. Some of them are garish but different people have different tastes. It's not really meant to be an exact imitation of teak. As I said before, many people don't like the look of teak decks.
Both are good products, IMO.