Hi MVweebles,
But if it all comes down to the boat, computer programs, and technology in general, why do the results vary so much?
If you're talking about the current results of the Prada Cup, the results vary so much because of the immature technology implemented in the present-day AC boats. NO team has had significant head-to-head time on the water necessary to debug the control packages aboard their respective boats. Thus, single errors lead to monstrous lead changes and poof-race over. This will inevitably change as the present-day AC event matures in the coming months. Hopefully, this will lead to something more akin to actual sailboat racing, vs simply a made-for-media event, designed and promoted by the sponsors to make money for themselves via TV advertising, and tourism dollars.
And how does Team NZ, a country of 5m people do so consistently well? Sure, UAE is a big investor, but by all rights, USA should walk away with this which simply hasn't happened."
It's a long way to the AC finals. Check back then. And remember, we live in a truly universal technical world via the WWW. NZ's access to that technology is every bit as common as other teams. And yes, the current Deed of Gift, and UAE sponsorship guarantees that.
Peter B:
Sigh...you're right Peter. These folk who poo-hoo these developments - there's a name for them you know - luddites...
Mea maxima culpa. PARTICULARLY amongst us luddites with a strong sailing background, that have actually participated in true sailing at an international level. And those of us that can seperate the "gee-whiz technology" elements of the current AC from actual competitive (ie-person-to-person) sailing. I simply decry the substitution of mechanical (on-board stored energy, for instance) and computer-aided technology for what has historically been a very personal (and human) endeavor.
Darkside:
No human could keep a 75ft monohull foiling on foils designed for such pace (and therefore less stability) so computers are needed.
My point exactly. So why bother with pesky humans?
If you want to watch 25 or 30kn boats with much more stable foils then for sure you could ditch the computer.
Uh, actually not. Passive foiling was first developed by Alexander Graham Bell in 1906. And that technology certainly has not progressed far from his original concept, and is essentially dead.
Peter Burling, Ben Anslie, Dean Barker and Jimmy Spithill are there for a reason.
Yes, and their cohorts (Andrew Campbell, et al, their "system controllers"). Not so much the other guys. Adjust the Deed of Gift a bit to again allow larger motive power packs aboard, and "the other guys" become redundant.
I guarantee if you ask your NA where to build an innovative, go faster, carbon sail boat NZ will be near the top of the list.
Can't disagree here. NZ has a significant boat building history and capability.
But that list is long. Personally, I'll simply call up Jim Betts in Annacortes.
Regards,
Pete