Will the Titanic claim a few more?

The friendliest place on the web for anyone who enjoys boating.
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.
SAR throughout the world seems to have a different set of difficulties when confronted with human trafficking. Think of the recent Italian navy’s experience. How do you rescue folks who don’t want to be rescued? How do you protect yourself and not place unarmed passengers at risk when the traffickers are armed and hostile? How do you deal with overloaded unstable vessels when language barriers and human emotion cause further risks of instability? How do you deploy assets when there maybe be 10 or 100+ to rescue? If you look at the Med several different countries SAR units have had their troubles. Not just Italy.
We have very long land borders so trafficking is predominantly by land not sea.
 
There was a recent migrant tragedy in Italian waters..... migrant issues and human trafficking are usually 2 different LEO situations...not always but for the most part migrants are not the same as illegal smuggling activity, thus different threat levels.
 
Interesting comments.
What is it about this thread that is now making you two uncomfortable? The comment about “brown dudes” maybe?

And is it usual for a thread to be “put to bed” on the whims of just 3% of the contributors?

This thread and most others once they diverge from the thread title should be split out into a new thread with a new title. The original thread can stay for new related information.
The question has been answered, YES, more lives were claimed.
The comparison of the other tragedy can be debated in a new thread meant for that purpose.
 
This week's New Yorker does a good job of explaining this tragedy. A well-sourced story of murderous incompetence, hubris and willful avoidance of the law, with many knowledgeable people trying repeatedly to head off the inevitable.

“Murderous incompetence, hubris, and willful avoidance of the law”?

Sounds like the name of a venture capital or private equity firm.
 
“Murderous incompetence, hubris, and willful avoidance of the law”?

Sounds like the name of a venture capital or private equity firm.

Or the mission statement.
 
I wonder if his passengers were aware of all those warnings

He had no passengers, carriage of passengers for hire would have been illegal, so he had a crew of "mission specialists," an absurd and patently illegal evasion.

The Frenchman, Nargeolet, who had a lot of relevant experience had received very specific warnings from experienced colleagues and responded, in effect: there are worse ways to die. One wonders if the 19-year-old shared his fatalism.
 
Last edited:
A good salesman can sell almost any BS.

Trouble is, when designers stand by their work and ride it to the depths, and it has succeeded in the past, selling BS is all that much easier against many outside opinions of severe danger.

One reason I never flew commercially after the USCG, is I had a hard time trusting organizations where I didn't get to know the crew personally and where the mechanics didn't necessarily fly the same aircraft I was. In the USCG I could trust the guys in my crew with my life...they certainly trusted me to bring them home.

So trusting others becomes a tricky issue... it's when outsiders stress that what you are doing is unsafe but the inner circle can sell you that it's not.
 
The Frenchman, Nargeolet, who had a lot of relevant experience had received very specific warnings from experienced colleagues and responded, in effect: there are worse ways to die.


That’s a stupid cliche. I’m what way was it romantic or chivalrous or respectable to be crushed to death in 1/20th of a second - it likely happened so fast that the crew didn’t even know they died, so they couldn’t have even “enjoyed” the moment
 
That’s a stupid cliche. I’m what way was it romantic or chivalrous or respectable to be crushed to death in 1/20th of a second - it likely happened so fast that the crew didn’t even know they died, so they couldn’t have even “enjoyed” the moment

I think that's the idea behind it. It's an attempt to do something cool, and if it fails and kills you, it's likely to be so fast you won't feel a thing.
 
A good salesman can sell almost any BS.

Trouble is, when designers stand by their work and ride it to the depths, and it has succeeded in the past, selling BS is all that much easier against many outside opinions of severe danger.

One reason I never flew commercially after the USCG, is I had a hard time trusting organizations where I didn't get to know the crew personally and where the mechanics didn't necessarily fly the same aircraft I was. In the USCG I could trust the guys in my crew with my life...they certainly trusted me to bring them home.

So trusting others becomes a tricky issue... it's when outsiders stress that what you are doing is unsafe but the inner circle can sell you that it's not.

One reason I never flew commercially after the USCG, is I had a hard time trusting organizations where I didn't get to know the crew personally and where the mechanics didn't necessarily fly the same aircraft I was.

Find this somewhat limiting and not logical. In terms of death per 100k I think it goes
Cars/personal trucks
Trains
Commercial carrier airplanes.

Now a days unless you can read codes and play with electronics some of the work on your car/truck is likely done by others. Although freight trains have made the news with fair regularity recently passenger deaths remain infrequent as does commercial airline passenger deaths.

Unfortunately in so many aspects of our life (medicine, clean water, food etc.) we are dependent upon others for our safety. Sure have no issue with trust but verify. Yes there are multiple occasions they let us down. Nor have issue with vetting providers and choosing accordingly. But do have issue with people making decisions on factors other actual statistical risk. Same occurred within Covid. Risk was 4 in a million. If your risk of death was greater than 4 in a million especially if it was multiples of that risk benefit justified doing it. My risk of death is greater doing my ablutions in a shower or making love with my wife than flying a commercial carrier . Maybe I’ll add grab rails and such but with still try to stay clean and enjoy my true love. When i worry about planes augering in I think the pilot is in front and he/she knows they will hit first.
 
The world of intelligence is one of smoke and mirrors. The US Navy might have decided to leak very specific information regarding capabilities on purpose. The information they know seems to be all over the Interwebs is very specific and it would seem the USN knew early on that the sub had imploded and that there were no survivors. So why leak information regarding capabilities especially on a system or system(s) that have not been discussed very much? SONUS was well known when it was in operation, the replacement to SONUS has been kept quiet.
Later,
Dan


SONUS??? Not to be nit picky, but I think you are referring to SOSUS?
Sound Surveillance System (SOSUS) was the original name for a submarine detection system based on passive sonar developed by the United States Navy
 
I imagine the beneficiaries can kiss any life insurance goodbye.



I expect all the victims were financially well healed, with the possible exception of the Frenchman (sorry, forgot his name), so likely no life insurance at play with net worth greatly exceeding any possible policy value.
 
Most of the "mission specialists" had wealth beyond what most of us will ever know.
If they had a life policy, the payment (or non-payment) of a benefit isn't likely to impact the beneficiaries much. The "donation" for each mission specialist was discretionary money. They had that to play with.

The bigger issue may be taxes when the wealth is transferred if the wealth is not held by an entity.

Action
 
Heard it said surgeons and tort lawyers make the worst private plane pilots. Possibly due to needing to have the belief their skill set is infallible. Leads to the belief they are infallible in other settings in some. So these 1% ers may have the same attitude. Obvious intelligent successful people who decided risk benefit justified engaging in this activity. Don’t think it’s comparable to a salesman selling a lousy product. Rather think the hubris of the principal of the company acted in synchrony with the hubris of the other occupants. Same result but different dynamic. Still tragic and condolences to all victims including the captain.
 
SONUS??? Not to be nit picky, but I think you are referring to SOSUS?
Sound Surveillance System (SOSUS) was the original name for a submarine detection system based on passive sonar developed by the United States Navy


Yes, I made a type o, and it should have been SOSUS.


later,
Dan
 
I just read that the pattern and distribution of wreckage suggests that ballast had been jettisoned prior to the implosion...suggesting that the crew were attempting an emergency ascent....
 
One reason I never flew commercially after the USCG, is I had a hard time trusting organizations where I didn't get to know the crew personally and where the mechanics didn't necessarily fly the same aircraft I was.

Find this somewhat limiting and not logical. In terms of death per 100k I think it goes
Cars/personal trucks
Trains
Commercial carrier airplanes.

Now a days unless you can read codes and play with electronics some of the work on your car/truck is likely done by others. Although freight trains have made the news with fair regularity recently passenger deaths remain infrequent as does commercial airline passenger deaths.

Unfortunately in so many aspects of our life (medicine, clean water, food etc.) we are dependent upon others for our safety. Sure have no issue with trust but verify. Yes there are multiple occasions they let us down. Nor have issue with vetting providers and choosing accordingly. But do have issue with people making decisions on factors other actual statistical risk. Same occurred within Covid. Risk was 4 in a million. If your risk of death was greater than 4 in a million especially if it was multiples of that risk benefit justified doing it. My risk of death is greater doing my ablutions in a shower or making love with my wife than flying a commercial carrier . Maybe I’ll add grab rails and such but with still try to stay clean and enjoy my true love. When i worry about planes augering in I think the pilot is in front and he/she knows they will hit first.

If I wasn't clear, I meant as a pilot not a passenger.

You logic isn't mine and mine not yours...we see it on so many posts....

Lets just face it...you and I disagree on so much...I will just leave it at that.
 
Last edited:

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom