Hippocampus
Guru
- Joined
- Jul 27, 2020
- Messages
- 4,182
- Location
- Plymouth
- Vessel Name
- Hippocampus
- Vessel Make
- Nordic Tug 42
Please read with accuracy.certificate of competency is needed in Europe as clearly stated.
Please read with accuracy.certificate of competency is needed in Europe as clearly stated.
Read the post I replied to, it was about working as a captainIt is not about financial reward at all when piloting your own vessel?!?
All this BS people spread about additional liability and infractions is mostly just that.... If you are cruising in foreign countries their laws prevail and they don’t care for the most part what the USCG says....
Read the post I replied to, it was about working as a captain
I dont care what the USCG says as I am not a US citizen
But here in Australia we still have laws to abide by and penalties for breaking them or, in the case of a captain, others breaking them but you held responsible.
Please read with accuracy.certificate of competency is needed in Europe as clearly stated.
So why are these people being asked by Cape Cod Canal and VTS operators for their cert?
Yep
But for most, the financial reward for that level of responsibility simply is not there.
Neither Conrad nor I had anything to say in that post about financial reward because the sentiment was about the reward of the responsibility itself. You are correct in that for the most part the financial reward-to-responsibility ratio is vanishingly small, but there are times at sea (and we are not talking of the pitifully few privileges of a captain) when you are in command when all the work and privation make it all worthwhile. It's a feeling few will ever know and and the vast majority, even boat owners who command only themselves, will ever know. You just have to be there.
It was true of most all military rank back in the day.
As I saw the US government substitute pay for responsibility and the benefits that went with rising in the ranks and culminating in command....I saw some serious issues develope in a system never designed to make money an issue.
Just that authority/ privileges were chipped away and pay was increased significantly to catch up with civilian counterparts.
I have mentioned the erosion of responsibility before here and lots of former service members seemed to agree.
Maybe I just didn't want to give up many of the niceties I remember back in the 70s that were mostly long gone by the late 90s.
Seems like something is going on...not sure exactly the problem, but the military seems to be relieving commanding officers on nearly a daily basis these days for all kinds of reasons....just where is the problem?