How about patching them with thick Lexan cut to fit the cutout area, then you would have natural light below.
Mike
I love productive novel IDEAS!!!
How about patching them with thick Lexan cut to fit the cutout area, then you would have natural light below.
Mike
How about patching them with thick Lexan cut to fit the cutout area, then you would have natural light below.
Mike
Pict # 6 makes your Baby look very svelte!!
How about patching them with thick Lexan cut to fit the cutout area, then you would have natural light below.
Mike
Greetings,
Mr. H. As per usual, impressive is much too "weak" a word. I hesitate to bring this up but what came to mind when viewing the "svelte" picture (#6) is the amount of filler you're applying above the water line. Given you're sanding quite a bit of it off to achieve perfection, have you calculated how much weight the filler is adding to the upper half of the hull? Will she be top heavy is the question, I suppose?
Now, that could be a brilliant idea, which might make Matt feel less dejected, and make those beautiful cut-outs really functional. He could even say it was "the plan" all along. Our lips are still sealed aren't that..? Many fancy high-end boats have ocean-safe clear inserts in the hull sides to let in light and to even look through. In his case he put them in to lighten the ER - perfect..!
I said Axe was top heavy about 1000 posts ago.
Nobody seemed to agree then ... why now?
Must have another 300 gallons of filler since.
She has looked a bit like the boat from the 70's called Cargile (or something like that. Was designed to be 1/2 vacation trailer and 1/2 boat. Combinations always miss the mark at both ends.
But pics can be decieving. Matt are you using a wide angle lens camera? The obvious thing to do is consult a NA.
The engine (Perkins 4-236?) will add quite a bit of weight down low. I have that engine in my boat, and if I remember correctly, maybe 1000 pounds? Is there any way you could get it on a trailer and into the water for a try? That's a bit out there but just doing some thinking.
The railroad track is not a bad idea Matt. Lots of boats have iron keelsomes bolted on for ballast methinks. BTW, the angled profile shot looks awesome.
The engine (Perkins 4-236?) will add quite a bit of weight down low. I have that engine in my boat, and if I remember correctly, maybe 1000 pounds? Is there any way you could get it on a trailer and into the water for a try? That's a bit out there but just doing some thinking.
Still not agreeing with ya. All pics are taken with my iPhone 6
Sent from my iPhone using Trawler Forum
After you've eaten too much you can't fix it by eating more.
Subtract don't add more.
OK good. Glad all is well.
Too early to say mate. Won't know till I launch her. If she floats alls well. She sinks alls not well
Sent from my iPhone using Trawler Forum
No worries then. If all is well go fishing, if not go diving. Either way win-win.
Looking great.