Benthic2
Guru
1.
I think your example highlights the very exact problem we are talking about. Your attempt to be helful was ineffective because you used the nautical term. If you said "Your bow line is in the water!" you would have actually been more helpful to the kid.
2. The argument listing rigging lines for a sailboat is null and void because there is no non-nautical term for a jib sheet or a main halyard. That is not a case of redundant terms that is just a case of specificity. A halyard is a line. The appropriate parallel is lumber vs 2x4, clothing vs pants, or University vs Oxford.
3. someone mentioned something about ships needing to tie up port side to the dock.....could someone explain this further ?
.....This past summer, a kid pulled away from his families anchored boat and had his painter dragging. I yelled several times that his painter was in the water. He looked at me confused and they proceeded to foul the dinghy prop in the painter.
Ya, I guess that's my fault. Stupid nautical terms. LOL!!!!
I think your example highlights the very exact problem we are talking about. Your attempt to be helful was ineffective because you used the nautical term. If you said "Your bow line is in the water!" you would have actually been more helpful to the kid.
2. The argument listing rigging lines for a sailboat is null and void because there is no non-nautical term for a jib sheet or a main halyard. That is not a case of redundant terms that is just a case of specificity. A halyard is a line. The appropriate parallel is lumber vs 2x4, clothing vs pants, or University vs Oxford.
3. someone mentioned something about ships needing to tie up port side to the dock.....could someone explain this further ?